Was Jesus a Republican?

Of course not, since the Republican Party was not founded until 1854.

But you would never know this from the way many in the party talk, claiming a monopoly on "faith and values" (meaning of course modern American Protestant interpretation of Christianity). This is a curious position considering that the Bible is silent on topics such as stem cell research and abortion (a broadening of the prohibitions against murder to include abortion require agreement with the logical leap that terminating a pregnancy represents murder). Most of the explicit prohibitions of homosexuality come from Leviticus and are side-by-side with condemnations of eating shellfish (Leviticus 11:10) or blasphemy. (A good summary of these prohibitions can be found in an anonymous letter to Dr. Laura.)

Consider this:

The Republicans tend to define morality and values in very narrow, private terms, most having to do with sex and reproduction. Public responsibility, such as caring for the poor or disabled ("the least among us") are subordinated to the private sexual litmus test. Prohibition of same sex marriage, scientifically-based sexual education, and abortion seem to make one "moral" (with the implication that those who oppose these prohibitions are immoral).

Curiously, despite these prohibitions, the Republicans consider themselves the party of "freedom" (never mind that "liberal" and "liberty" share the same root). (The word "freedom" occurs only twice in the King James version of the Bible, yet 27 times in Bush's 2005 inaugural address. )

Is there historical evidence that these ideas are congruent with the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth? I've tried to break down the major issues that Republicans have advanced into the public arena over the past few years?

 

 

Issue:

Jesus' answer:

Republican stand:

Democratic stand:

Should gays be allowed to marry?

Probably not.

Inferred to be generally disapproving but this would have been reflective of the mores of Mediterranean and Jewish culture, lumped together with other types of discouraged behavior, e.g., "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God." (1 Cor. 6:9-10) If this passage was trying to make a point about homosexuality specifically it was clear that being covetous or a swindler or a "reviler" was just as bad.

No.

Unnatural, a threat to marriage, the family, perhaps even national security (Jerry Falwell famously attributed the Twin Towers attacks to inter alia homosexuals. Bush has expressed support for those who wish to amend the Constitution to prohibit same sex marriage.

Some Republicans, such as Sheri Dew, a Mormon publisher and activist who gave the 2004 Republican National Convention invocation, likened opposition to gay marriage to opposition to Hitler.

Maybe one day.

Generally more tolerant although few major political candidates support gay marriage; most oppose a Constitutional Prohibition but support a form of partnership.

Should abortion be legal?

?

N/A - no safe, effective abortion was available in Biblical times.

No.

Abortion is murder; there is no difference between terminating a 6-week-old pregnancy and murdering a sentient adult human being.

Federal funding should be cut off from any organization that even talks about abortion.

Doctors should be forbidden from discussing abortion as one of several options with their patients.

Yes.

Abortion should be safe, legal, and rare. No one is "pro abortion" but this decision should be between a woman and her doctor.

Should scientifically-based sexual education be taught in the public schools?

?

N/A - no safe, effective birth control was available in Biblical times.

No.

Children and young adults should be prohibited about learning about contraception and effective family planning techniques. This ban should be extended to women in poor countries that receive United States aid. Faith-based programs such as "abstinence-only" programs that promote the religious ideal of chastity before marriage may be allowed, regardless of efficacy.

Yes.

Should the teaching of the theory of evolution be prohibited?

?

The theory of evolution was not developed until over 1800 years after Jesus. The Bible is silent on evolution, fossils, geology, and deep time.

Yes.

In the Georgia public schools, a campaign has been launched to place a sticker on all textbooks warning evolution is only a theory; no other scientific theories will carry such a warning. Religious theories such as "intelligent design" will be taught in their place.

No.

Scientific theories will be taught based on their merit and the weight of evidence supporting them, not idiosyncratic interpretations of ancient texts.

Should we pass massive tax cuts that go mostly to the wealthiest in our society?

No.

There are approximately 7,000 passages dealing with Christ's concerns re the poor and down-trodden. It is unlikely that he would have seen a reduction in the capital gains tax as consistent with his teachings of compassion for the poor.

 

 

If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. (Matt. 19:21)

 

Verily, I say unto you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. ... It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. (Matt. 19-23).

 

 

Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal. ... For where you treasure is, there will your heart be also. (Matt. 6: 19, 21)

 

No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. (Matt. 6:24)

 

Take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth. (Luke 12:15).

 

 

Yes.

No.

Should we torture detainees?

No.

When Christ said to love your enemies he probably didn't mean to torture (or even kill) them.

Yes.

White House memos and public comments by senior administration officials make quite clear that torture prohibitions are not viewed as universal, and torture has been widely documented in detention centers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo Bay.

Yes/No.

The Democratic Party has failed to make a consistent, unequivocal condemnation of the Bush administration's torture policy, although some Democrats, such as Senator Kennedy have admitted "we have a torture problem."

Should we launch a "pre-emptive" war?

No.

Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

(Matt. 5:9)

Ye have heard that it hath it said, thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you and pray for them that despitefully use you and persecute you. (Matt. 5: 43-44)

Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth; but I say unto thee, that ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turned him the other also. (Matt. 5:38 39)

 

As with torture, when Christ said to love your enemies he probably didn't mean to kill them. Jesus was not known as the Prince of Pre-emptive War. A Christian trying to rationalize pre-emptive war (which in the case of Iraq now appears to have been a war of aggression) might claim Christ was relatively silent on military matters, but endorsement of war seems far-fetched if not sacrilegious.

Yes.

Yes/No.

The Democrats were unwilling or unable to make a clear, consistent stand on this issue in the 2004 election, instead quibbling about operational details (the How rather than the Why).

Do you support capital punishment?

Probably Not.

As a victim of capital punishment, one might think Jesus could be Exhibit A in why capital punishment a.) can get the wrong guy and b.) is ineffective.

Yes.

President Bush approved of more executions while government of Texas than any other governor and it is quite clear from his "dead or alive" rhetoric that he supports capital punishment.

Yes/No.

More opponents of the death penalty are Democratic than Republican but many conservative Democrats support the death penalty.

 

If there is a pattern here, it does not seem a Republican or Democratic one. Perhaps one can be both a Christian and a Republican, but one most certainly does not flow naturally from the other. Driving an SUV, enjoying a tax cut, while listening approvingly as a conservative radio show host advocates napalming Fallujah can be many things, but Christian is not the first thing that comes to mind (even if your SUV has a fish symbol or a Bush-Cheney sticker on the back).