System ill equipped for PTSD
Troops returning with psychological wounds confront
bureaucracy, stigma.
washingtonpost.com
June 16, 2007
by Dana Priest and Anne Hull
The
Army Spec. Jeans Cruz helped capture Saddam Hussein. When he
came home to the
But a "black shadow" had followed Cruz home from
In public, the former Army scout stood tall for the cameras
and marched in the parades. In private, he slashed his forearms to provoke the
pain and adrenaline of combat. He heard voices and smelled stale blood. Soon
the offers of help evaporated and he found himself estranged and alone,
struggling with financial collapse and a darkening depression.
At a low point, he went to the local Department of Veterans
Affairs medical center for help. One VA psychologist diagnosed Cruz with
post-traumatic stress disorder. His condition was labeled "severe and
chronic." In a letter supporting his request for PTSD-related disability
pay, the psychologist wrote that Cruz was "in need of major help" and
that he had provided "more than enough evidence" to back up his PTSD
claim. His combat experiences, the letter said, "have been well
documented."
None of that seemed to matter when his case reached VA
disability evaluators. They turned him down flat, ruling that he deserved no
compensation because his psychological problems existed before he joined the
Army. They also said that Cruz had not proved he was ever in combat. "The
available evidence is insufficient to confirm that you actually engaged in
combat," his rejection letter stated.
Yet abundant evidence of his year in combat with the 4th
Infantry Division covers his family's living-room wall. The Army Commendation
Medal With Valor for "meritorious actions . . . during strategic combat
operations" to capture Hussein hangs not far from the combat spurs awarded
for his work with the 10th Cavalry "Eye Deep" scouts, attached to an
elite unit that caught the Iraqi leader on Dec. 13, 2003, at Ad Dawr.
Veterans Affairs will spend $2.8 billion this year on mental
health. But the best it could offer Cruz was group therapy at the Bronx VA
medical center. Not a single session is held on the weekends or late enough at
night for him to attend. At age 25, Cruz is barely keeping his life together.
He supports his disabled parents and 4-year-old son and cannot afford to take
time off from his job repairing boilers. The rough, dirty work, with its heat
and loud noises, gives him panic attacks and flesh burns but puts $96 in his
pocket each day.
Once celebrated by his government, Cruz feels defeated by
its bureaucracy. He no longer has the stamina to appeal the VA decision, or to
make the Army correct the sloppy errors in his medical records or amend his
personnel file so it actually lists his combat awards.
"I'm pushing the mental limits as it is," Cruz
said, standing outside the bullet-pocked steel door of the
An old and growing problem
Jeans Cruz and his contemporaries in the military were never
supposed to suffer in the shadows the way veterans of the last long, controversial
war did. One of the bitter legacies of
Yet nearly three decades later, the government still has not
mastered the basics: how best to detect the disorder, the most effective ways
to treat it, and the fairest means of compensating young men and women who
served their country and returned unable to lead normal lives.
Cruz's case illustrates these broader problems at a time
when the number of suffering veterans is the largest and fastest-growing in
decades, and when many of them are back at home with no monitoring or care.
Between 1999 and 2004, VA disability pay for PTSD among veterans jumped 150
percent, to $4.2 billion.
By this spring, the number of vets from
A deluge of depressed vets
They occupy every rank, uniform and corner of the country.
People such as Army Lt. Sylvia Blackwood, who was admitted to a locked-down
psychiatric ward in Washington after trying to hide her distress for a year and
a half and Army Pfc. Joshua Calloway, who spent eight months at Walter Reed
Army Medical Center and left barely changed from when he arrived from Iraq in
handcuffs; and retired Marine Lance Cpl. Jim Roberts, who struggles to keep his
sanity in suburban New York with the help of once-a-week therapy and a medicine
cabinet full of prescription drugs; and the scores of Marines in California who
were denied treatment for PTSD because the head psychiatrist on their base
thought the diagnosis was overused.
They represent the first wave in what experts say is a
coming deluge.
As many as one-quarter of all soldiers and Marines returning
from
But numbers are only part of the problem. The Institute of
Medicine reported last month that Veterans Affairs' methods for deciding
compensation for PTSD and other emotional disorders had little basis in science
and that the evaluation process varied greatly. And as they try to work their
way through a confounding disability process, already-troubled vets enter a VA
system that chronically loses records and sags with a backlog of 400,000 claims
of all kinds.
Proof-of-trauma standard questioned
The disability process has come to symbolize the
bureaucratic confusion over PTSD. To qualify for compensation, troops and
veterans are required to prove that they witnessed at least one traumatic
event, such as the death of a fellow soldier or an attack from a roadside bomb,
or IED. That standard has been used to deny thousands of claims. But many
experts now say that debilitating stress can result from accumulated trauma as
well as from one significant event.
In an interview, even VA's chief of mental health questioned
whether the single-event standard is a valid way to measure PTSD. "One of
the things I puzzle about is, what if someone hasn't been exposed to an IED but
lives in dread of exposure to one for a month?" said Ira R. Katz, a
psychiatrist. "According to the formal definition, they don't
qualify."
The military is also battling a crisis in mental-health
care. Licensed psychologists are leaving at a far faster rate than they are
being replaced. Their ranks have dwindled from 450 to 350 in recent years. Many
said they left because they could not handle the stress of facing such pained
soldiers. Inexperienced counselors muddle through, using therapies better
suited for alcoholics or marriage counseling.
A new report by the Defense Department's Mental Health Task
Force says the problems are even deeper. Providers of mental-health care are
"not sufficiently accessible" to service members and are inadequately
trained, it says, and evidence-based treatments are not used. The task force
recommends an overhaul of the military's mental-health system, according to a
draft of the report.
Another report, commissioned by Defense Secretary Robert M.
Gates in the wake of the Walter Reed outpatient scandal, found similar
problems: "There is not a coordinated effort to provide the training
required to identify and treat these non-visible injuries, nor adequate research
in order to develop the required training and refine the treatment plans."
But the Army is unlikely to do more significant research
anytime soon. "We are at war, and to do good research takes writing up
grants, it takes placebo control trials, it takes control groups," said
Col. Elspeth Ritchie, the Army's top psychiatrist. "I don't think that
that's our primary mission."
Stigma of PTSD proves a ?barrier to
care?
In attempting to deal with increasing mental-health needs,
the military regularly launches Web sites and promotes self-help guides for
soldiers. Maj. Gen. Gale S. Pollock, the Army's acting surgeon general,
believes that doubling the number of mental-health professionals and boosting
the pay of psychiatrists would help.
But there is another obstacle that those steps could not
overcome. "One of my great concerns is the stigma" of mental illness,
Pollock said. "That, to me, is an even bigger challenge. I think that in
the Army, and in the nation, we have a long way to go." The task force
found that stigma in the military remains "pervasive" and is a
"significant barrier to care."
Surveys underline the problem. Only 40 percent of the troops
who screened positive for serious emotional problems sought help, a recent Army
survey found. Nearly 60 percent of soldiers said they would not seek help for
mental-health problems because they felt their unit leaders would treat them
differently; 55 percent thought they would be seen as weak, and the same
percentage believed that soldiers in their units would have less confidence in
them.
Lt. Gen. John Vines, who led the 18th Airborne Corps in
Officers and senior enlisted troops, Vines added, were
concerned that they would have trouble getting security clearances if they
sought psychological help. They did not trust, he
said, that "a faceless, nameless agency or process, that doesn't know them
personally, won't penalize them for a perceived lack of mental or emotional
toughness."
Overdiagnosed or overlooked?
For the past 2 1/2 years, the counseling center at the
Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in Twentynine
Palms,
"Valbracht didn't believe in
it. He'd say there's no such thing as PTSD," said David Roman, who was a
substance abuse counselor at Twentynine Palms until
he quit six months ago.
"We were all appalled," said Mary Jo Thornton,
another counselor who left last year.
A third counselor estimated that perhaps half of the 3,000
Marines he has counseled in the past five years showed symptoms of
post-traumatic stress. "They would change the diagnosis right in front of
you, put a line through it," said the counselor, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity because he still works there.
"I want to see my Marines being taken care of,"
said Roman, who is now a substance-abuse counselor at the Marine Corps Air
Station in
?Enough medicine to kill a mule?
In an interview, Valbracht denied
he ever told counselors that PTSD does not exist. But he did say "it is
overused" as a diagnosis these days, just as "everyone on the East
Coast now has a bipolar disorder." He said this "devalues the
severity of someone who actually has PTSD," adding: "Nowadays it's
like you have a hangnail. Someone comes in and says 'I have PTSD,' " and counselors want to give them that diagnosis
without specific symptoms.
Valbracht, an aerospace medicine
specialist, reviewed and signed off on cases at the counseling center. He said
some counselors diagnosed Marines with PTSD before determining whether the
symptoms persisted for 30 days, the military recommendation. Valbracht often talked to the counselors about his father,
a Marine on Iwo Jima who overcame the stress of that battle and wrote an
article called "They Even Laughed on
Valbracht retired recently
because, he said, he "was burned out" after working seven days a week
as the only psychiatrist available to about 10,000 Marines in his 180-mile
territory. "We could have used two or three more psychiatrists," he
said, to ease the caseload and ensure that people were not being overlooked.
Former Lance Cpl. Jim Roberts's underlying mental condition
was overlooked by the Marine Corps and successive health-care professionals for
more than 30 years, as his temper and alcohol use plunged him into deeper
trouble. Only in May 2005 did VA begin treating the
To control his emotions now, Roberts attends group therapy
once a week and swallows a handful of pills from his VA doctors: Zoloft, Neurontin, Lisinopril, Seroquel, Ambien, hydroxyzine, "enough medicine to kill a mule," he
said.
Roberts desperately wants to persuade
"In here" can mean different things. It can mean a
1960s-style vet center such as the one where Roberts hangs out, with faded
photographs of Huey helicopters and paintings of soldiers skulking through
shoulder-high elephant grass. It can mean group therapy at a VA outpatient
clinic during work hours, or more comprehensive treatment at a residential
clinic. In a crisis, it can mean the locked-down psych ward at the local VA
hospital.
"Out there," with no care at all, is a lonesome
hell.
Losing a bureaucratic battle
Not long after Jeans Cruz returned from
When he met with counselors while he was on active duty,
Cruz recalled, they would take notes about his troubled past, including that he
had been treated for depression before he entered the Army. But they did not
seem interested in his battlefield experiences. "I've shot kids. I've had
to kill kids. Sometimes I look at my son and like, I've killed a kid his
age," Cruz said. "At times we had to drop a shell into somebody's
house. When you go clean up the mess, you had three, four, five, six different
kids in there. You had to move their bodies."
When he tried to talk about the war, he said, his counselors
"would just sit back and say, 'Uh-huh, uh-huh.' When I told them about the
unit I was with and Saddam Hussein, they'd just say, 'Oh, yeah, right.' "
He occasionally saw a psychiatrist, who described him as
depressed and anxious. He talked about burning himself with cigarettes and
exhibited "anger from
Stressed out, then tossed out
Counselors at
Two weeks later, Cruz reenlisted. He says the Army gave him
a $10,000 bonus.
His problems worsened. Three months after he reenlisted, a
counselor wrote in his medical file: "MAJOR depression." After that:
"He sees himself in his dreams killing or strangling people. . . . He is
worried about controlling his stress level. Stated that he is
starting to drink earlier in the day." A division psychologist,
noting Cruz's depression, said that he "did improve when taking medication
but has degenerated since stopping medication due to long work hours."
Seven months after his reenlistment ceremony, the Army gave
him an honorable discharge, asserting that he had a "personality
disorder" that made him unfit for military
service. This determination implied that all his psychological problems existed
before his first enlistment. It also disqualified him from receiving
combat-related disability pay.
There was little attempt to tie his condition to his
experience in
Cruz's records are riddled with obvious errors, including a
psychological rating of "normal" on the same physical exam the Army
used to discharge him for a psychological disorder. His record omits his combat
spurs award and his Army Commendation Medal With
Valor. These omissions contributed to the VA decision that he had not proved he
had been in combat. To straighten out those errors, Cruz would have had to deal
with a chaotic and contradictory paper trail and bureaucracy -- a daunting task
for an expert lawyer, let alone a stressed-out young veteran.
When group therapy makes things worse
In the Aug. 16, 2006, VA letter denying Cruz disability pay
because he had not provided evidence of combat, evaluators directed him to the
U.S. Armed Services Center for Research of Unit Records. But such a place no
longer exists. It changed its name to the U.S. Army and
To speed things up, staff members often advise troops to
write to the National Archives and Records Administration in
But Cruz has given up on the records. Life at the Daniel
Webster Houses is tough enough.
After he left the Army and came home to the
Medications were easy to come by, but some made him sick.
"They made me so slow I didn't want to do nothing with my son or manage my
family," he said. After a few months, he stopped taking them, a dangerous
step for someone so severely depressed. His drinking became heavier.
To calm himself now, he goes outside and hits a handball
against the wall of the housing project. "My son's out of control. There
are family problems," he said, shaking his head. "I start seeing
these faces. It goes back to flashbacks, anxiety. Sometimes I've got to leave
my house because I'm afraid I'm going to hit my son or somebody else."
Because of his family responsibilities, he does not want to
be hospitalized. He doesn't think a residential program would work, either, for
the same reason.
His needs are more basic. "Why can't I have a counselor
with a phone number? I'd like someone to call."
Or some help from all those people who stuck their business
cards in his palm during the glory days of his return from
Staff researcher Julie
Tate contributed to this report.
2007 The Washington
Post Company